*** jcater has quit IRC
*** kilo has joined #gnuenterprise
*** btami has joined #gnuenterprise
*** reinhard has joined #gnuenterprise
<reinhard> good morning all
*** sjc has joined #gnuenterprise
<kilo> good morning
<btami> good morning
<dimas_> good morning
<ajmitch_> good morning
*** dimas__ has joined #gnuenterprise
*** dimas__ has quit IRC
*** yure has quit IRC
*** yure has joined #gnuenterprise
*** btami has quit IRC
*** yure has quit IRC
*** kilo has quit IRC
*** sjc has quit IRC
*** jamest has joined #gnuenterprise
*** dimas__ has joined #gnuenterprise
*** btami has joined #gnuenterprise
*** btami has quit IRC
*** dneighbors has joined #gnuenterprise
*** dimas__ has quit IRC
*** jcater has joined #gnuenterprise
<reinhard> oh
<reinhard> somebody created an issue for designer in our bug tracking system!
<jamest> good
<jamest> i think :)
<reinhard> seems to be related to amd64
<reinhard> btw, jamest, did you have a look at the parameters issue we talked about yesterday?
<reinhard> if not, I might find some time tonight to have a look myself
<jamest> no, i burnt out after 11 hrs of doing stuff for this place :(
<reinhard> ok
<reinhard> so I'll look at it
<jamest> i can do it today
<jamest> i meant to do it
<jamest> i just couldn't take anymore :)
*** klasstek has joined #gnuenterprise
<reinhard> hmmm... something I wonder about parameters now that I look closer
<reinhard> parameters seem to be global at gfd level (i.e. at <form> level)
<reinhard> but on the other hand they seem to be used to pass info between the main form and dialogs
<reinhard> hmmm... doesn't our XML parser check whether a tag is allowed at a given place?
<reinhard> appearantly not
<reinhard> is this desired behaviour?
<jamest> the xml tag thing?
<jamest> i thought it did?
<jamest> i thought there was even a parents attribute in the parser definition
<jamest> so it'd know where something was valid
<reinhard> I just tried to add a <staticfiedset> below a <dialog>
<reinhard> and forms just swallowed it without choking
<jamest> well then
<jamest> that's probably a bad thing :)
<reinhard> and I can't find any instance where ParentTags would be checked at all
<reinhard> but we can agree on
<reinhard> you looking at the parameters and I looking at checking valid parents :)
*** yure has joined #gnuenterprise
<jamest> ok :)
<jcater> reinhard, you're talking about adding parent tag checking to the parser, and not about getting rid of the ParentTags parameter, right?
<reinhard> sure
<reinhard> making use of it, not removing it :)
<jcater> okay
<jcater> it was originally added for our self-generating docs
<reinhard> I'm already curious how many forms will break after that change
<jcater> I thought we added actual checks to the parser too
<reinhard> ;-)
<jcater> but I guess that never made it off the todo
<jcater> pay attention to the (aptly mis-named) 'UsableBySiblings'
<jcater> in GParser
<jcater> that should have been called "UsableByChildren"
<jcater> but if true, then ParentTags implicitly should include all child tags of the named object
*** SachaS has joined #gnuenterprise
*** sjc has joined #gnuenterprise
*** btami has joined #gnuenterprise
*** kilo has joined #gnuenterprise
*** dneighbors has quit IRC
*** SachaS has quit IRC
<reinhard> jcater: only the child tags, or also the "grandchildren" etc?
*** btami has quit IRC
<jcater> reinhard, grandchildren too
<reinhard> ok
<jcater> for example, the conditions tag
<jcater> most of the logic tags can be indefinitely nested
<reinhard> ah, I understand
<reinhard> thanks
<reinhard> ok, check for valid parents committed
<reinhard> wonder how many existing forms this will break...
<jamest> not more than all of mine I would imagine :)
<reinhard> good night all
*** reinhard has quit IRC
*** klasstek has quit IRC
*** jamest has quit IRC
*** yure has quit IRC
*** jcater has quit IRC
*** jamest has joined #gnuenterprise
*** jcater has joined #gnuenterprise
*** kilo has quit IRC
*** sjc has quit IRC
*** yure has joined #gnuenterprise
*** jamest has quit IRC
*** jcater has quit IRC
*** yure has quit IRC